Monday, September 1, 2008

Why Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton must be the next Senate Majority Leader

To understand the importance of Senator Clinton holding this position, a review of precisely what the position involves is required.

Senate Majority leaders and Senate minority leaders lead their parties in the Senate, the term that covers both is "floor leader". The Majority Leader is from the Party who holds a majority in the Senate. The current Senate Majority Leader is Harry Reid (who, as it happens, was deeply involved in the results-driven Democratic Party presidential nomination process). Senator Reid holds the post of Majority Leader rather than Minority Leader rather precariously - because at the moment the Democratic majority in the Senate is razor thin. The current majority consists of 51 Senators (with two Independents currently designated as Democrats for purposes of calculating the majority; these is because these Senators are part of the Democratic Senate Caucus). The Republican minority consists of 49 members.

In 2009, the Democrats have a meaningful chance to make their majority large enough to override any Presidential veto of legislation passed by the house. (Such a veto requires 60 votes, and one problem the current Senate has had in controlling the excesses of the Bush-Cheney administration is that the Democratic Party has had insufficient votes to guarantee an override.)

Two basic factors make 2009 a promising one for securing a larger Democratic majority. First, the Republicans have 23 seats at stake whereas the Democrats have only 12. But these numbers alone overstate the opportunity for Democrats to take a more commanding lead in the Senate, because many of the Republicans running for reelection come from "safe" districts.

States with seriously competitive races include Alaska (where the Palin pick helps the Republican candidate despite the disastrous Republican incumbent Ted Stevens, who is under every kind of investigation for every type of corruption imaginable); Colorado; Louisiana; Maine; Minnesota (where Al Franken is challenging a Republican incumbent); Mississippi; New Hampshire; New Mexico; North Carolina; Oregon; and Virginia. [source]

Regardless of how each races turn out though, it is reasonable to predict that the Democrats will go into 2009 with a Majority in the Senate and a larger one than the current one.

An effective Senator Majority Leader not only leads her Party's Senators, she knows when and how to reach across the aisle to work with select Republicans who will co-author good bipartisan bills and Republican Senators who will vote for sensible legislation regardless of Party affiliation. She works closely with the Republican Minority Leader to make these things happen. As described by the U.S. Senate's own website:
Although party floor leadership posts carry great responsibility, they provide few specific powers. Instead, floor leaders have largely had to depend on their individual skill, intelligence, and personality. Majority leaders seek to balance the needs of senators of both parties to express their views fully on a bill with the pressures to move the bill as quickly as possible toward enactment. These conflicting demands have required majority leaders to develop skills in compromise, accommodation, and diplomacy. Lyndon Johnson, who held the post in the 1950s, once said that the greatest power of the majority leader was "the power of persuasion."

The majority leader usually works closely with the minority leader so that, as Senator Bob Dole explained, "we never surprise each other on the floor." The party leaders meet frequently with the president and with the leaders of the House of Representatives. The majority leader also greets foreign dignitaries visiting the Capitol.

Senator Clinton is eminently qualified for this role. (Indeed her experience in the Senate and the respect in which she is held there were among the reasons she would have been such an excellent Democratic President this year, since working effectively with the legislative branch, especially the Senate, is a large part of what makes a President successful.) She has the policy ideas and the political savvy that can make the Senate an extremely powerful force for progressive change. Senator Clinton has the respect of foreign leaders the world over.

Furthermore, Senator Clinton now enjoys a popular mandate for her views and policies: she won more votes than any other presidential contender in a primary season ever has; polls show that were she running against John McCain she would be beating him handily; and she is a politician of national prominence who has support from rank and file voters of all affiliations.

Thus, the importance of making sure that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is elected by her Democratic peers to lead them in the Senate. Information on how rank and file Democrats can work toward this objective to follow. Stay tuned.

7 Comments:

Anonymous hill4pres said...

I totally agree. As Senate Majority Leader, Hillary can speak openly against the issues that McCain/Palin stand for - if McCain/Palin win, then Hillary will be a force to contend with and it sets her up nicely for 2012 run for democrats.

September 1, 2008 at 12:26 PM  
Blogger SARAH SINGH said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4ZWAUtWQ1Y
http://carpetride.wordpress.com/

Great new video response to Greta wire…

September 1, 2008 at 1:09 PM  
Anonymous DWPforHILL said...

I look forward with great anticipation for the information on how to work toward this goal.

Senator Hillary Clinton - Lioness of the Senate!

September 1, 2008 at 2:21 PM  
Blogger sister of ye said...

That's a far better use of Clinton's talents than being an overqualified veep and trying to clean up Obama's messes.

I remember growing up the 1960s, when senators and representatives hadn't given up their standing, when people like Dirksen were national names to rival the president. Yeah, people know Kennedy, but that's more for his family name than his mixed bag of accomplishments.

When I still hung out at the Big Blue Blog, people would oppose Clinton on the grounds of "not wanting a dynasty." As if Poppy Bush buying an election for his idiot son was the same as two brilliant people who happened to marry each other both having great things to contribute to the political scene.

September 1, 2008 at 3:19 PM  
Blogger hummingbirdv said...

That's a far better use of Clinton's talents than being an overqualified veep and trying to clean up Obama's messes
- sister of ye

ABSOLUTELY! Heidi, thanks for the rundown on Maj. Leader. Hill is a perfect match for this. Anything specific we can do to advocate for this to happen? When is Majority Leader chosen?

September 1, 2008 at 5:09 PM  
Blogger The Freelance Minion Blog said...

I've been reading these weird posts by "PUMAs" and finally I come across a pro-HRC idea I might be able to get behind. The immediate leadership of the New Dem Majority seemed pretty weak kneed, if HRC will promise to stand up for some old fashioned Democratic values like siding with individuals and consumers against corporations, standing up against the President, whoever it is, not to get into more stupid wars, considering taxes on Billionaires before cutting benefits to children and vets, THEN she'd be a great Majority Leader. The problem is, in her time as a senator she HASN'T always done those things. But for a concrete promise and description of how she would accomplish the above, I'd be in favor of her skipping over other's seniority to take it.

September 2, 2008 at 12:34 AM  
Blogger Narcolepsy0627 said...

That would make me so happy! If she can't be president, she should be cracking heads together in the Senate.

-drawnlines.blogspot.com

September 5, 2008 at 7:12 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home